by John Calvin | July 11th, 2010
After yesterday’s post about the Voyage of the Dawn Treader, where I mentioned Prince Caspian’s disastrous deviation from the original story, I realized I had never posted this article I wrote shortly after seeing the film on the thematic structure and motifs of Prince Caspian. (I intentionally did not comment on the interpolated romance between Caspian and Susan, which I consider to be extremely distracting and damaging to the film as a whole and possibly the franchise.)
We Are All Minotaurs
Last week I went opening night with three of my brothers to see the new Chronicles of Narnia film, Prince Caspian. The film does not follow the book really closely, but it did do some things very well, and it set me thinking. Before I watched the film, I had always thought of Prince Caspian as a rather pointless book. It wasn’t a grand allegory like The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe or The Last Battle, but it didn’t have a particular theme of its own like Dawn Treader or The Silver Chair—or so I thought. Although they discarded massive chunks of the book when making the film, the filmmakers retained every line of the dialogue that dealt with the spiritual side of the story, emphasizing the thematic and allegorical elements that made it what it was. As the film closed I was amazed—they hadn’t added anything to the familiar lines from the book (in that particular realm), but they had drawn out a theme which I hadn’t really seen as integral to the story.
It really dawned on me when Lucy finally meets Aslan—when towards the end, she talks to him at last. Aslan asks her, “Little One, why didn’t you come to me?” She answers, “But…but—the others wouldn’t believe! They wouldn’t listen to me!” “Yes, I know, but why didn’t you come?”She looks down, and with a catch in her voice admits, “I-I guess I was scared. But-but Aslan?!–if I had come when I saw you, would the others be dead?” “Lucy, how many times have I told you that you cannot know what would have been? But what will be—that is a different matter!” I realized that that was the true meaning, the real theme of the story—that sometimes we have to take things on faith, and not waver—that Caspian had to trust the Professor, trust that the horn would bring help, trust that the children and then Aslan would truly help him. Peter, Susan, Edmund and not least Lucy had to place their faith implicitly in Aslan, even when it looked like they had been pulled into Narnia only to die. They needed to follow him, even when it looked like he was leading them over a precipice to their doom. When things looked darkest, they had to take it on faith that Aslan would save them, that they were to be found fighting for the cause when he came. This theme was brought out powerfully throughout the movie, resulting in perhaps an even more thematic film than book.
When I was sitting there putting all the pieces of the puzzle together, I remembered a strange detail I had noted earlier in the film. There were Minotaurs fighting alongside Centaurs and Fauns in Caspian’s army! In the book, there were remnants of both good and bad Narnia in the forest, and they had joined forces originally, but the evil elements were soon found to be unable to work alongside the good. True, that happened in the movie, but the Minotaurs were not involved in the mutiny. I suddenly realized that the filmmakers, in transforming the story for the silver screen, had created a very interesting visual metaphor in the participation of the Minotaurs in Caspian’s army. One Minotaur had even been highlighted, when in one battle, a gate is dropped behind much of the army and a Minotaur throws himself beneath it, bracing himself to hold it up and allow his comrades to escape. Even when gut-shot by one of Miraz’s archers, he stood there long enough for most of the army to escape. Something seemed strange here. Thinking back, what were the most visible members of the Witch’s army in The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe? The Minotaurs, of course! And yet here they were, fighting and dying for the right side this time. How could that be? They didn’t deserve it! It was then I realized that the themes of redemption, repentance, and salvation were only strengthened by this motif. The Minotaurs were unspeakably evil, in fact the very symbols of the dark army, but after the death of the Son they too were offered grace. Now, despite their heritage, they had the privilege of fighting in the King’s army, and giving their lives for Him. The allegory dawned on me—what are we but Minotaurs in the cosmic sense? We are the “unspeakably evil” ones, the ones whose kindred were present and participated in the death of the Creator’s Son. Yet we had been offered free grace, and we were the ones who should be awed to be asked to give our fortunes or our lives in the King’s service. Truly we too have more to appreciate than any other. We are all Minotaurs. We ought not to forget it, either.
That’s how book adaptations ought to be—the filmmakers using the strengths of the medium to enhance and reinforce the themes of the original work. Not to say that the filmmakers did everything right with Prince Caspian—far from it—but that the metaphor of the redeemed Minotaurs fighting in the King’s army left me with a poignant image of the theme, one which left me thinking for days. That’s the way it ought to be.
September 25th, 2010 at 7:45 am
That’s a very interesting thought!
I do enjoy watching Prince Caspian, even though it deviates much from the book and tends to have some of the worst dialogue ever written.
But as far as having a good character arc goes, Peter’s journey is excellent. They just needed to work on the execution a lot more.